Austin A Potential Hub of Social Enterprise
By Nell EdgingtonThe terms Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship are often used interchangeably, but they are really two very different concepts. While social entrepreneurship is defined as pattern changing ideas for solving persistent social problems (you can read my post laying out this definition here) Social Enterprise is any business that has a double bottom line, i.e. they exist to make a financial AND social profit. Although I think both have potential in Austin, I would argue that Social Enterprise could really thrive in Austin’s entrepreneurial, venture capital, tech-savvy, green economy.
There is a continuum of social enterprise that ranges from a nonprofit that has an earned income venture on the side (an art museum gift shop) all the way to a publicly traded for-profit company that includes a social good in its business model (a solar panel company).
More and more people are becoming interested in the idea of social enterprise as a necessary and very viable part of a strong American and global economy. The blending of financial and social return could be a necessary salve to an economy that has been torn apart by lack of regulation and greed.
In fact, some social enterprises seem to be thriving despite the recession. Better World Books is a great example of this. They collect and sell used books online and then give a good part of the profit to nonprofit literacy programs throughout the world. They are also saving thousands of tons of waste by keeping discarded books from ending up in landfills. They are achieving a triple bottom line: financial, social, and environmental profit. And they are doing very well, despite the recession:
- Since launching in 2002 the company has converted 16.4 million donated books into $5 million in funding for literacy and education.
- This holiday season they saw a 500%+ increase in gift certificate sales over the previous holiday season.
- Revenue grew 194% in December 2008 compared to the year before.
- December revenues grew to $2.1 million and revenue for January is expected to top $4.5 million.
- They are on target for $31 million in revenues this fiscal year.
Better World Books got a significant investment of $4.5 million in April 2008 from Good Capital, a venture capital firm whose investments have BOTH a social and financial return.
So, what you start to see is an interesting model that could really take off in Austin. We already have tremendous venture capital wealth. We have a very entrepreneurial business climate. We have a real interest in social causes, particularly green ones. What if some of the investment capital floating around the city went to social enterprises? In fact, I think there is an opportunity for Austin to create a new model for cultivating social enterprise and become a real leader in this space. Nathaniel Whittemore, Director of the Center for Global Engagement at Northwestern University, described in a recent blog an ideal environment to stimulate successful social enterprise:
So here is what I’d like to see. Someone combines The Hub model of collaborative working space for social entrepreneurs with the Y-Combinator model of funding low-cost tech startups [provide promising startups small amounts of seed capital and intense mentorship and networking in anticipation of further investment ]. In this model, which is geared toward social enterprise, the Y-Combinator style investment would be focused on tech startups that are building services useful for other businesses and social startups (things like Yammer, which is great for keeping a team of volunteers or employees connected to one another). In addition to the cash investment, the tech startups get to work (and maybe even live?) in the Hub space. In return, they give up equity – but also a small chunk of their developer time (25%? 10 hpw?) to pro-bono or reduced cost projects for the nonprofit social entrepreneurs who are part of the same Hub community. This combines the density, talent and energy of the tech startup world with the mission focus of the social enterprise world. All it would take are the right partners. Sounds like a pretty good combination to me…
Doesn’t this sound like Austin? We have all kinds of tech incubators and venture and angel capital. If there were a social enterprise incubator/venture fund here, we could be on the cutting edge of this movement. And we have all the pieces already in place to make it happen. It’s a pretty interesting proposition.
Related posts:
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Most Popular Posts
Recent Posts
- A Boot Camp for Young Social Entrepreneurs
- The Change.org Social Entrepreneurship Blog
- A Watershed for the Social Capital Market?
- Climb on Board, Austin
- Can PRIs Support Fundraising and Capacity Building?
- The Power of a Case
- The Social Side of Entrepreneurship
- What We Can Learn From Idealist
- Convergence Can’t Be Denied
- Let’s Take a Step Back in the Outcomes Debate
Links
- Andrew Wolk
- B Corporation
- Beth's Blog: How Nonprofits Can Use Social Media
- Change.org's Social Entrepreneurship Blog
- Chronicle of Philanthropy
- Dan Pallotta
- New Philanthropy Capital
- Nonprofit Harvest
- Philanthropy 2173
- PhilanTopic
- Philosopher 2.0
- Reimagine Money Blog
- Skoll Foundation Blog
- Social Earth
- Stanford Social Innovation Review Opinion
- Tactical Philanthropy