<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Messaging Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/05/messaging-impact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/05/messaging-impact/</link>
	<description>Accelerating Social Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nell Edgington</title>
		<link>http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/05/messaging-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Nell Edgington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialvelocity.net/?p=758#comment-512</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,

I agree that it might be difficult to craft a message of impact with enormous challenges like poverty, human rights and justice for war criminals, but it is not impossible.  Buying a goat is great, but what is it really doing?  To craft effective messaging you need to get beyond to reach the donors &quot;who are interested in transformational change that takes time.&quot;  If an investor buys a goat aren&#039;t they really enabling a person to create their own source of income, which makes that person self-sustainable, which then makes that community healthier and stronger which then helps to make that part of the world healthier and safer and less apt to dissolve into conflict and war.  This is just an example, but my point is that effective messaging is about pushing the message farther and continuing to ask &quot;so what does that  mean?&quot; &quot;so what does a goat do for this person, and then for this community and then for this country and then for the world?&quot;  By continuing to push the messaging and the argument further, fundraisers can uncover the impact and thus uncover those donors interested in transformational change and multi-faceted, multi-sourced investments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>I agree that it might be difficult to craft a message of impact with enormous challenges like poverty, human rights and justice for war criminals, but it is not impossible.  Buying a goat is great, but what is it really doing?  To craft effective messaging you need to get beyond to reach the donors &#8220;who are interested in transformational change that takes time.&#8221;  If an investor buys a goat aren&#8217;t they really enabling a person to create their own source of income, which makes that person self-sustainable, which then makes that community healthier and stronger which then helps to make that part of the world healthier and safer and less apt to dissolve into conflict and war.  This is just an example, but my point is that effective messaging is about pushing the message farther and continuing to ask &#8220;so what does that  mean?&#8221; &#8220;so what does a goat do for this person, and then for this community and then for this country and then for the world?&#8221;  By continuing to push the messaging and the argument further, fundraisers can uncover the impact and thus uncover those donors interested in transformational change and multi-faceted, multi-sourced investments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/05/messaging-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialvelocity.net/?p=758#comment-511</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent post, and holds true here in Canada as well, from my experience. The only addition I would make is that for some non-profits (like those who are involved in international issues of poverty alleviation, human rights protection and justice for war criminals) it is often difficult to generate a message that conveyes a sense that a donor investment is going to be able to address the enormity of the challenges. I believe that this challenge is what has lead fundraisers to messages of &quot;buy a goat&quot; or &quot;sponsor a child&quot; or &quot;build a well.&quot; These are perhaps facile, but they are measurable investments to which donors respond. Sadly, these sorts of message do not necessarily attract the donors who are interested in transformational change that takes time, multi-faceted (and multi-sourced) investments, and the perseverance of the international community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent post, and holds true here in Canada as well, from my experience. The only addition I would make is that for some non-profits (like those who are involved in international issues of poverty alleviation, human rights protection and justice for war criminals) it is often difficult to generate a message that conveyes a sense that a donor investment is going to be able to address the enormity of the challenges. I believe that this challenge is what has lead fundraisers to messages of &#8220;buy a goat&#8221; or &#8220;sponsor a child&#8221; or &#8220;build a well.&#8221; These are perhaps facile, but they are measurable investments to which donors respond. Sadly, these sorts of message do not necessarily attract the donors who are interested in transformational change that takes time, multi-faceted (and multi-sourced) investments, and the perseverance of the international community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

