<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 and the Future of the Social Sector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/09/2010-and-the-future-of-the-social-sector/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/09/2010-and-the-future-of-the-social-sector/</link>
	<description>Accelerating Social Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nell Edgington</title>
		<link>http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/09/2010-and-the-future-of-the-social-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Nell Edgington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialvelocity.net/?p=1066#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Great insights into where the UK is with this, Graham. Thanks for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great insights into where the UK is with this, Graham. Thanks for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Gardiner</title>
		<link>http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/09/2010-and-the-future-of-the-social-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Gardiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialvelocity.net/?p=1066#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>Great Post. Very thought provoking. And timely. (I am writing from a UK perspective) 

In regard to Increased Philanthropic Dollars Will Go to Organization Building, we can only hope so. Most funding (grants) are given to provide a service. Yet they are almost always short term. And they never cover the core costs of running an organisation. The ability for organisation&#039;s to get funding to secure their ability to build capacity is very rare. AS you so eloquently pointed out, this is very short term thinking. I really hope you have got this right!! The sector is crying out for it. 

In the UK there is a huge move to measuring outcomes through processes such as Social Return On Investment. We&#039;re just completing a research project on the Economic Impact of the Third Sector (Charities, Community Groups, Social Enterprises etc) on the City of Nottingham, and it is clear that the sector needs to evidence its worth much more clearly than it does already. 

The danger of all of this for me is that we end up doing the job of commissioners; especially local government. It is surely up to them to establish the social return of say, getting 20 long term unemployed into work. What social enterprises can do is ADD to that by saying not only will be get you your 20 long term unemployed into work, saving you £thousands, but we will do it by employing LT unemployed people as advisors, provide a creche out of the contract cost etc. 

Social Enterprises, and other Third Sector organisations, can provide amazing additionality, that goes way beyond that of the private sector. 

I hope that makes sense and is not too full of UK jargon! 

Great site. Thanks for sharing your views. 


Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post. Very thought provoking. And timely. (I am writing from a UK perspective) </p>
<p>In regard to Increased Philanthropic Dollars Will Go to Organization Building, we can only hope so. Most funding (grants) are given to provide a service. Yet they are almost always short term. And they never cover the core costs of running an organisation. The ability for organisation&#8217;s to get funding to secure their ability to build capacity is very rare. AS you so eloquently pointed out, this is very short term thinking. I really hope you have got this right!! The sector is crying out for it. </p>
<p>In the UK there is a huge move to measuring outcomes through processes such as Social Return On Investment. We&#8217;re just completing a research project on the Economic Impact of the Third Sector (Charities, Community Groups, Social Enterprises etc) on the City of Nottingham, and it is clear that the sector needs to evidence its worth much more clearly than it does already. </p>
<p>The danger of all of this for me is that we end up doing the job of commissioners; especially local government. It is surely up to them to establish the social return of say, getting 20 long term unemployed into work. What social enterprises can do is ADD to that by saying not only will be get you your 20 long term unemployed into work, saving you £thousands, but we will do it by employing LT unemployed people as advisors, provide a creche out of the contract cost etc. </p>
<p>Social Enterprises, and other Third Sector organisations, can provide amazing additionality, that goes way beyond that of the private sector. </p>
<p>I hope that makes sense and is not too full of UK jargon! </p>
<p>Great site. Thanks for sharing your views. </p>
<p>Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiva Can&#8217;t Get Growth Capital!? &#171; Ventures</title>
		<link>http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/09/2010-and-the-future-of-the-social-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiva Can&#8217;t Get Growth Capital!? &#171; Ventures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialvelocity.net/?p=1066#comment-743</guid>
		<description>[...] be given the risk capital to take a shot at these new, deeper issues, it&#8217;s Kiva. There are hopeful signs for change on the horizon, but if the foundations and investors of the world can&#8217;t or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be given the risk capital to take a shot at these new, deeper issues, it&#8217;s Kiva. There are hopeful signs for change on the horizon, but if the foundations and investors of the world can&#8217;t or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention 2010 and the Future of the Social Sector &#124; Social Velocity -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.socialvelocity.net/2009/09/2010-and-the-future-of-the-social-sector/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 2010 and the Future of the Social Sector &#124; Social Velocity -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialvelocity.net/?p=1066#comment-705</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tony Wang and Dhaval Chadha. Dhaval Chadha said: trends in the social sector in 2010 @socialedge http://twurl.nl/vl48vv and http://twurl.nl/87ks73 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tony Wang and Dhaval Chadha. Dhaval Chadha said: trends in the social sector in 2010 @socialedge <a href="http://twurl.nl/vl48vv" rel="nofollow">http://twurl.nl/vl48vv</a> and <a href="http://twurl.nl/87ks73" rel="nofollow">http://twurl.nl/87ks73</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

